We’ve Been Played: Princess Diana was murdered

Conspiracy Theories, Part Three

Weve+Been+Played%3A+Princess+Diana+was+murdered

Diana was murdered, by her own family.

She was being too good. She was helping children injured by land mines. She was possibly pregnant with Dodi Fayed’s baby. Divorce and then a child out of wedlock, how would that make the royal family look? She might take Prince Henry and Prince William away from England. The Royal Family could not suffer something like that. She had to go.

Dodi Fayed was Diana’s boyfriend. Diana was allegedly pregnant with his child, and they were soon going to be engaged. Dodi Fayed was a prominent Egyptian Muslim. The Royal Family was not going to tolerate that the mother of the future King of England was going to be married to a non-Christian. Mohamed Al-Fayed, Dodi’s father, said that the couple was going to announce their engagement the Monday after the crash which occurred on September 1, 1997. Dodi had picked the ring up at a jeweler the day before he died. There is no other evidence to back these claims up though and many other accounts including Diana’s sister, her spiritual advisor and her friends say that Diana did not want to be married to anyone at this point in her life.

Mohamed Al-Fayed, has made 175 “conspiracy claims”. A police inquiry team was formed and Al-Fayed claims that Diana and his son were murdered. Here is evidence for and against the theory that Princess Diana, “The People’s Princess” was murdered by MI6, the British intelligence agency, at the command of her children’s grandmother.

The driver of the Mercedes, Henri Paul, was the acting head of the Ritz security. Suspicions arose that, before and at the time of his death, he had large sums of suspicious money in his possession. He was allegedly working for MI6 who set him up. His blood sample showed that his blood alcohol level was three times the French legal limit. A British pathologist hired by Mohamed Al-Fayed challenged this sample. A third sample was taken and showed that his blood alcohol level was indeed above the limit and that he was also on antidepressants. But this was inconsistent with his sober demeanor witnessed on the Ritz security cameras. A TOXLAB was taken where his carbon hemoglobin saturation, which is common in smokers, showed a level of 20.7%, which is very high, but because of the rate of dispersal for carbon monoxide in the blood stream his levels at the time of the crash would leave him unable to function at all, let alone drive a car. His blood samples could have easily been switched. Something like switching blood samples would have been a simple job for any MI6 agent. Then on November 2006 Lord Stevens the head of the inquiry team met with Paul’s parents to inform them that their son was NOT drunk at the time of the accident. Whaaaaat??

Richard Tomlinson an ex-MI6 agent claims in a sworn statement in May 1999 that MI6 had most definitely been involved in the crash that killed Princess Diana, Dodi Al-Fayed and Henri Paul. He reported that both Henri Paul and one of Diana’s security guards were working for MI6 at the time of the crash. Tomlinson also informed that MI6 was monitoring both Diana and Fayed before there deaths. Tomlinson explained that their death was similar to plans MI6 had to assassinate the President of Serbia. The plan consisted of a strobe light being used to blind the chauffeur causing a fatal crash inside of a tunnel.

The lack of video surveillance at the time of the crash is some of the largest evidence that the death of Diana was in fact an organized assassination. The camera at the entrance of the tunnel had no video for the night that the Mercedes crashed. There were 14 surveillance cameras on the route between the hotel and the tunnel and none of these 14 cameras recorded the fatal crash or anything leading up to the crash. The department controlling the camera at the entrance to the tunnel closed at 11 pm and had no night staff that night and no recordings either. The fact that no cameras recorded anything from the night of the crash is very suspicious. Why would a surveillance camera department close at 11pm? Don’t crime levels rise at night heightening the need for surveillance video recordings?

This is all very suspicious, but you should do your own research and draw your own conclusions. Whether you think Princess Diana was a casualty in a fatal accident or a victim of the Royal Family’s need to appear perfect her death will be remembered forever.